Colin Powell Leadership Characteristics

Introduction â€Å"I consider myself a moderate Republican. I have very, very moderate social views, and I am pretty strong on, on defense matters† (BookRags Media Network, 2011, p. 23).Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Colin Powell Leadership Characteristics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This was Powell’s assertion of his life as a leader. Powell has been admired and loathed by many, perhaps because of his involvement in the American-Iraq conflict or his ability to play â€Å"fair† in the Bush administration. Powell’s nature as a moderate republican influenced the perception republicans and democrats (alike) because both parties had similar views about him (Waxman, 2005, p. 1). Considered a high-ranking member of the Bush administration, Powell was a â€Å"fair† leader. Many people may agree or differ with this view, but this paper acknowledges that, Powell’s leadership characteristics were participative and democratic. Participative and democratic leadership has always been assumed to be the inclusion of all stakeholders in the decision-making process. In the organizational setup, the participative style of leadership would mainly include the inclusion of employees in the decision-making processes of the organization. However, in the context of this study, the participative style of leadership will be understood within the context of an informed and multifaceted leadership style. In contrast, this leadership style can be compared to the authoritarian and the free-reign styles of leadership. This paper explores different dynamics of Powell’s leadership characteristics. However, there is a strong focus on the extent Powell exhibited ethical behavior, political acumen, emotional intelligence, charismatic behavior, transformational leadership, and overall leadership effectiveness. These leadership dynamics will comprehensively be use d to support the arguments of this paper, but before this analogy is undertaken, an analysis of Powell’s life and accomplishments will be done. This analysis provides a thorough understanding of Powell’s transitions from an ordinary citizen to a position of enormous responsibility in the American government. Background Summary Colin Powell is known to be the first African-American personality to serve in the position of the Secretary of State for the US government (Waxman, 2005, p. 1). Powell was born from immigrant parents (who came from Jamaica). Certain reports however say that, Powell also has a Scottish ancestry.Advertising Looking for research paper on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Powell studied at Morris high school where he graduated with a high school diploma (in 1954) and later joined the City College of New York where he graduated with a bachelor’s degree in Science (Waxman, 2005, p. 3). He later pursued his postgraduate studies at the George Washington University where he graduated with a master’s degree in Business Administration. Powell joined the US army at a cadet level (in the Reserve Officers Training Corps). In June, 1958, Powell was promoted to be a second lieutenant in the US army (Waxman, 2005). This promotion kicked of a series of other promotions which saw him scale up the ranks of the US army, through the positions of: first lieutenant, captain, major, lieutenant-colonel, colonel, brigadier general, major general, lieutenant general, and general (respectively). These promotions occurred between 1959 and 1989 (Waxman, 2005). Nonetheless, Powel’s influence in government started when he was appointed to be a Whitehouse fellowship under the presidency of Richard Nixon. In the early 1980s, Powell was appointed to be a senior advisor to the US department of defense, and in 1989, George W. Bush appointed him to be a Joint Chief of Staff (Wa xman, 2005, p. 11). During Powell’s service as the Joint Chief of Staff, he was involved in the decision-making process that saw the US take part in the invasion of Panama, and the Persian Gulf War. Considering Powell’s stand in these wars, he was branded the infamous name, â€Å"the reluctant warrior† (Waxman, 2005, p. 24). Powell was branded â€Å"the reluctant warrior† because he never advocated for military intervention as the first remedy to solving international conflicts. Powell instead opted for diplomacy and containment as the primary modes of problem solving. For instance, Powell was on record to advise the US against supporting the Chilean coup d’à ©tat (in 1971) because he opted for a more inclusionary style of leadership (Waxman, 2005, p. 89). Generally, Powell perceived his military strategy to be guided by the principles of minimizing tragedies and maximizing successes (as was seen from the Gulf war, where the war was generally perc eived to be guided by the â€Å"Powell doctrine†) (Finlayson, 2003). Powell’s somewhat lukewarm approach to aggressive force forms the framework for subsequent sections of this paper because we observe that, Powell’s doctrines were largely participative and democratic. Political Acumen Powell’s political acumen was strongly evident in his advice to the US government about invading Iraq. At first, Powel was hesitant in supporting US’s recourse to invade Iraq because he was wary of the repercussion of invading an American country.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Colin Powell Leadership Characteristics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In an interview cited in ABC (2005), Powell is quoted to have advised the former US president, George Bush, about the consequences of invading Iraq and being the â€Å"occupiers†. In the same interview, Powell is said to have advised the US government to follow the diplomatic channel (first) before they resorted to military actions against Iraq. Powell also admitted that, he was ready to support the war on Iraq if the president saw that the diplomatic channel of dispute resolution would not solve the Iraqi problem. It is from this argument that Powell exudes political acumen because he is conscious of the repercussion of invading Iraq by advised the US government against doing so. Resolving disputes through diplomacy is a better way of solving international conflicts. Powell clearly understood so. Though wars may be waged on countries, it was Powell’s philosophy that this channel be the last recourse because it is very costly to wage war on another nation. Powell’s political acumen was also seen in the hurricane Katrina disaster where he offered a voice of reason to all the accusations surrounding the federal government’s response to the disaster. Generally, there was a strong perception amo ng Americans (and more so, the African-American population) that the federal government’s slow response to facilitating evacuation efforts was racially motivated (ABC, 2005, p. 3). Powell however said that, the slow response of the federal government was occasioned by the economic struggles plaguing the people of New Orleans. He further said that, the victims of New Orleans failed to act decisively (to warnings about hurricane Katrina) because they were not economically empowered to do so. He even stated that, for certain regions in New Orleans, one in ten families owned a car (ABC, 2005, p. 3). It was therefore impossible for such families to vacate their homes because they either lacked the means to do so, or had nowhere else to go. Comprehensively, Powell rubbished accusations that the severity of Hurricane Katrina was caused by slow government response. Indeed, Powell’s analogy shows how he soberly assessed the Katrina disaster by laying blame where it did. Though he also hailed from the African-American descent, he never joined the call for government condemnation against the Bush administration. He assessed the disaster from a very rational point of view.Advertising Looking for research paper on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Emotional Intelligence Powell’s emotional intelligence was seen in his admission that, he made a wrong judgment on Iraq by informing the US government and the United Nations that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. Since this information turned out to be false, Powell decided to take the blame for misguiding the UN and the US government that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He did not blame his junior staff or the intelligence system for misleading him because he defended the CIA director, George Tenet, for giving him such information because he did not think it was Tenet’s intention to lie to him. In an interview cited in ABC (2005) Powell said, he believes his wrong advise to the UN and the US tarnished his reputation because it went on record that, he made a wrong judgment of Iraq. He admitted that, â€Å"Of course it will. It’s a blot. I am the one who presented it for the United States to the world, and [it] will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It’s painful now† (ABC, 2005, p. 3). This admission exudes Powell’s emotional intelligence Ethical Behavior Powell’s ethical behavior was put to the test when there were accusations that he supported the Iraq war, based on his loyalty to the Bush administration (and not because of his personal ethics). During the time, there were calls for him to resign because the Iraq war turned out to be very messy and costly (ABC, 2005, p. 3). However, Powell did not heed to these calls because he did not want to be seen as a coward (ABC, 2005, p. 3). He admitted to the ABC news network that he did not want to be thought as a coward for supporting a war; whereby, if things got messy, he backed out (ABC, 2005, p. 3). The moral dilemma here was his resignation, because of the extent of the damages that the Iraq war caused, but he decided to stay the course because he knew he the going would be rough. Powell’s decision to retain his position was un ethical because he decided to support the Iraq war, though the support for the war was increasingly unpopular among the American public. Moreover, the war caused a lot of damages, including the loss of lives and a deficit on the US federal budget. It was unethical for Powell to retain his position as the secretary of state when the Iraq war had accrued a lot of damages since it was his responsibility as a leader to take political responsibility for the war (especially considering he had guided the government to take action against Iraq because it possessed weapons of mass destruction). As mentioned in earlier sections of this study, this turned out not to be true. Nonetheless, Powell’s ethical stand regarding the Iraq war emphasizes the thesis of this paper because his decision shows that, though Powell was largely perceived to be reluctant and â€Å"passive†, he was also quite adamant and aggressive in wading off attempts to make him resign. This level of persistence shows Powell’s ability to withstand negative pressures that often surround leaders. More importantly, it shows another side of Powell that negatively contrasted with his critics’ opinion that he was a passive leader (or one who could not rise up to the occasion when he was challenged to). However, his action (to stay in office) reinforces the view that, Powell was a reluctant warrior; only that, his reluctance was evident in his hesitation to step down. Charismatic Leadership and Powell’s Effectiveness Powell’s charisma in the US politics and in international diplomacy stretches across various domestic and international issues. However, in the US, Powell’s charisma was strongly evident in his ability to garner support from republicans and democrats (Finlayson, 2003). The democrats liked him because they believed he had a moderate political view on various national issues, including military matters. The republicans liked him because he was one of t heir own and because he was an asset to the success of various republican administrations (Finlayson, 2003). His ability to secure the support of both democrats and republicans emanated from his charisma in the political field. His charisma was greatly admired from both political factions, and as history would judge, it is not easy to secure the support of both democrats and republicans (at the same time). However, Powell was successful in doing so. In fact, in 1992, Powell was voiced as a potential candidate for the democrat vice president nominee (Finlayson, 2003, p. 45). This support (from the democratic side) set him to replace Dan Quayle as the potential vice president nominee for the 1992 presidential election. However, Powell declined to take up the challenge and instead declared his support for the republican wing of government, which saw him support John McCain as the republican nominee. The former president, George Bush, however won the republican nomination and Powell shi fted his support to Bush. This drastic shift in allegiance shift shows Powell’s flexibility in politics because he was able to shift his allegiance in a moment’s notice. Nonetheless, Powell’s aggressive participation in the republican elections (through his support for republican nominees) shows his participative leadership style. His allegiance to the Republican Party and his support for Bush resulted in his appointment as the secretary of state. Through Powell’s declared support for the Republican Party; his charisma and moderate stance on political issues pleased many republicans, thereby prompting some legislators to suggest his election as the 1996 republican presidential candidate. His election would have seen former president Clinton lose his opportunity to be the US president. The possibility of Powell defeating Bush was very real because hypothetical elections done in New Hampshire (and some states in the US) showed that, he beat Clinton 50-38 (F inlayson, 2003). This hypothetical election was a mirror to the New Hampshire vote which saw Powell win the vice-presidential primaries. However, Powell declined to take up the challenge and declared that, he lacked a passion for politics. His reluctance to participate in the 1996 elections reinforces the assumption that, Powell was a very reluctant leader because his odds of winning the vice president’s ticket, or even standing up as a good opponent to former president, Bill Clinton, was high. With a strong political support from his republican nominees and the split conservative vote that prevailed in Iowa (then) would have seen Powell stand a good chance of winning the vice president’s nomination, if not the presidential elections of 1996. As the secretary of state, Powell’s role in the US government was very important because of the war on terrorism and the importance of the US in forging international partnerships to fight the war against terrorism. Though Powell’s term as the secretary of state saw him travel less frequently than other individuals who had been in the same position (for the last 30 years); Powell’s influence in the Bush administration was very effective. In fact, his influence in the Bush administration is attributed to be the main factor that saw America look for international partners to wage the war against terrorism (Finlayson, 2003, p. 23). Powell is attributed to be the main force behind Bush’s attempt to push America’s agenda through the UN (to fight terrorism). Powell was opposed to the idea of America’s invasion of the Middle-east (from a unilateral approach). Considering America pursued a comprehensive approach to fight terrorism (that included the inclusion of NATO forces such as Britain), we can agree that, Powell’s leadership style was very effective. Furthermore, Powell’s strong charisma in the United Nations (UN) saw him convince the UN that a military ac tion was appropriate for the Iraq case. Powell’s ability to prevail on the UN (to grant military action against Iraq) was recorded in a plenary session of the UN (in 2003), where he successfully convinced the UN that Saddam was producing nuclear weapons which could destabilize global security (Finlayson, 2003). UN’s acceptance of the military action was attributed to Powell’s oratory speech, though some sections of the UK press faulted his speech because some of its sections were based on unreliable sources. Nonetheless, the US government highly relied on Powell’s charisma to sell US’s agenda to the UN, which he successfully managed to do. Powell’s charisma was his main tool for convincing the UN that the US needed to go to war. To further strengthen the argument that Powell was a â€Å"reluctant/moderate† leader; he was spared from all the condemnation that the Bush administration received for taking the decision to go to war with Ir aq. The American public (and critics) allocated more blame to other officials in the Bush administration (compared to Powell) because they believed Powell adopted a moderate stand on the war. Also, his commitment to pursue diplomatic partnership in the war painted Powell in a positive light because his ideology was less aggressive than many critics would believe. Powell’s push to pursue an international approach to the Iraqi conflict also affirms the perception that Powell’s leadership style was participatory. Leaders who pursue the participatory style of leadership always observe respect and the engagement of all stakeholders involved in an issue. In this regard, Powell was able to build more diversity in the Iraq war and equally, he was able to create a sense of shared responsibility among all members of the alliance forces who took part in the Iraq war. From this understanding, Powell’s leadership style seemed more advanced and sustainable because it was more democratic than other leadership styles (and it was also able to capitalize on human-to-human relationships). Transformational Leadership Despite the fact that, Powell served in a regime which was mainly perceived to be composed of members of the â€Å"old guard†; Powell was largely a transformational leader. Powell’s inclination to transformational leadership was evident on two fronts. The first front was his participation in the Iraq war. Though he admitted that he made a wrong judgment of Saddam Hussein (and his weapons of mass destruction); Powell was never remorseful of the fact that, America was able to topple the Saddam regime (Finlayson, 2003). He identified that, the Saddam regime was repressive and authoritarian to the Iraqi people and Saddam needed to go. His support for a change of regime and ideology in Iraq is an indication of Powell’s support for transformational leadership. Moreover, his support for the ousting of Saddam’s regime reinforc es the notion that, he was a moderate leader because on one hand, he never advocated for the aggressive removal of Saddam (through military power), but on the other hand, he supported the removal of Saddam’s regime (all the same). Powell’s leadership style is very tactical in this context because he adopted a multi-faceted approach to the Iraqi war. This approach was similar to his ability to appeal to both democrats and republicans. The second front where Powell’s element of transformational leadership shows was in his support for president Barrack Obama (though he was a strong republican follower). In fact, there were reports suggesting that, Powell was going to be to be McCain’s running mate (ABC, 2005). In an interview cited in ABC (2005), Powell said that, he admired McCain but he thought Obama was more of a transformational leader than McCain. He agreed with many observers that Obama was very inspirational, and he represented a new spirit in America that McCain did not. Powell cited Obama’s inclusive campaigns which sought to appeal to all members of the economic divide and across all races in America. This style of leadership was similar to Powell’s participatory leadership style. Powell also faulted Mc Cain’s choice for Sarah Palin as his running mate because he thought it was an error of judgment on the part of Mc Cain because people knew very little of Sarah. Comprehensively, he stated that, his support for Obama was largely because he believed America needed a transformational leader. Conclusion Weighing Powell’s ideologies on leadership, we can agree that, Powell’s infamous attribute as a â€Å"reluctant† leader was true. Powell’s leadership style was very dynamic and inclusionary because he was able to appeal to opposing parties (such as the appeal to democrats and republicans). Powell’s leadership style was dynamic because he supported the goals of the American go vernment in realizing domestic and international peace but he often differed on the methodologies of doing so. His advocacy for an inclusionary approach to the Iraq war is one such instance where he supported the ousting of Saddam but disagreed with Bush on pursuing a unilateral military approach. Powell should therefore be perceived to be a democratic leader who was reluctant in pursuing aggressive approaches to solving international and domestic conflicts. He should also be perceived as a transformational leader who advocated for change, regardless of if it was in his favor (such as the support of Barrack Obama who was a democratic candidate). Powell also had a lot of respect for all stakeholders (involved in various political issues) and he always had the interests of everybody at heart. These qualities made him appeal to many people (enemies and foes alike). Comprehensively, we can see that Powell was a democratic and fair leader. References ABC. (2005). Colin Powell on Iraq, Ra ce, and Hurricane Relief. Retrieved from: https://abcnews.go.com/ BookRags Media Network. (2011). Colin Powell Quotes. Retrieved from: https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/colin_powell Finlayson, R. (2003). Colin Powell. New York: Twenty-First Century Books. Waxman, L. (2005). Colin Powell. Washington: Lerner Publications. This research paper on Colin Powell Leadership Characteristics was written and submitted by user Charleigh Guthrie to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

The Jungle Essay essays

The Jungle Essay essays Allegory of Charles I of England and Henrietta of France in a Vanitas Oil on canvas painting as done by Frenchmen by the name of Simon Renard de Saint-Andre between the years of 1669 and 1677. The main purpose in evaluating this piece of work is to be aware and describe the physical features, content and symbolization of this painting. This will undoubtedly include the complexity of painting and historical content of the painting. Allegory of Charles I of England and Henrietta of France in Vanitas has many admirable physical features. At first glance , it is a massive painting. It is much larger than other painting sand it seems to engulf the whole wall. The large bulky frame of the painting is plain until your eyes wonder to the top center of it. There is a large flat shell like protrusion surrounded by a flower and imbedded in beads giving it a slight touch of class that it did not have before. Starting from the top, are a low solemn dark atmosphere and further down the painting y ou go the mood gets lighter and more colorful. However the first thing we see at the top are four bubbles floating in the air. They are floating up from a shell. The shell is resting in the hand of a white stoned sculpted baby boy. The shell itself also holds four more bubbles . They could represent the bubble s of life. Bubbles in general reflect things, as in a mirror. Could these bubbles exemplify the life of a man? They seem to be telling us of times to come or of times past. Behind the baby are two half statures of women. They look Roman-like in appearance. These classical busts have on robes of possibly something like a toga. The statues seem to be in a darker background than the baby boy is . It could be the background or it could be that during these times the Romans were looked down upon and in this portrait they were neglected from the light as Judas was in Leonardos Last Supper. Going further down the picture, the light and the colors seem...

Sales - fairmont royal York Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Sales - fairmont royal York - Assignment Example rom this above provided list of services one can appropriately understand about the types of services along with the level of quality that this hotel chain has to provide with the prime intention of retaining its market presence. Appropriate provision of all these services also requires the availability of trained staff members the details regarding, which has been mentioned in the later sub parts (FRHIb, 2014). Appropriate maintenance of a large hospitality chain such as ‘Fairmont Royal York’ requires the presence of highly efficient staff members who should be capable of catering to every specific hospitality requirement of the clients. Likewise, the sales personals associated with this hospitality chain should also have to evaluate and quantifiably analyze the expectation of the customers while rendering the services to them. Embedded steps within the entire customer convincing procedures, include the imparting precise knowledge to the customers regarding all the services that have been structured by the Fairmont Royal York. The sales personals should also provide the customers with appropriate suggestion regarding which packages they should be choosing. An instance in this context can be provided by taking reference of the variety of accommodation packages being provided by this hotel chain. In this context, the sales personal might take assistance of the ecommerce website of this hospitality chain for clarifying all the possible confusions of the customers. Regardless of tall these, the sales personals associated with this hotel should also have the capability of analyzing the pre-existent market information regarding other similar types of hospitality chains through which they can impart better developmental suggestion towards ‘Fairmont Royal York’ (FRHIc, 2014). Rather than just concentrating on a single emergent or matured product, this hospitality chain endorses a variety of emergent and well established services upon which the strategies related

Assessing the interest and motives of tourists towards Langkawi Island Literature review

Assessing the interest and motives of tourists towards Langkawi Island - Literature review Example Indeed, travel behaviors define whether tourists choose to visit a destination as a motivational aspect. Travel behaviour defines how tourists behave according to their attitudes before, during, and after traveling (Vuuren, Slabbert, 2011). In assessing the interest and motives of tourists towards Langkawi, we can consider the aspect of responsible tourism in the Island to establish tourists’ perceived expectations of the destination. In this context, responsible tourism seeks to offer quality travel experience to tourists, which conserve nature. In a study that sought to support responsible tourism and assess tourists’ interest and motives in Langkawi, the researchers used a random sample of tourists that included both Malaysians and non- Malaysians (Nair and Azmi 2008, p. 29). The study concentrated on the tourist’s perception of responsible tourism and tourist attractions in Langkawi. According to the study, most tourists visiting Langkawi know and pursue their interests and motives that relate to responsible tourism (Nair and Azmi 2008, p. 31). Apparently, all tourists have interests in destinations that manifest appealing environmental, economic, and sociocultural factors that define responsib le tourism. Notably, tourists visiting Langkawi have interest and motives in historical places like the Langkawi Cultural Village (Nair and Azmi 2008, p. 35). Moreover, they have interest and motives in the hospitable reception and friendliness exhibited by the people of Malaysia. The resounding duty-free shopping status experienced by the tourists defines their interest and motives of visiting this destination. The study establishes that both the Malaysian and non-Malaysian tourists depict immense interest in the relaxation derived from visiting Langkawi (Nair and Azmi 2008, p. 36). Indeed, most tourists come to Langkawi as a break from their normal duties and hence their interests and motives

Pablo Casals Essay Example for Free

Pablo Casals Essay Pablo Casals, one of the most recognizable cellists in history, was born December 29, 1876. His career was unsurpassed by any other cellist during the first half of the twentieth century. He is known for the multiple recordings throughout his career which included solo, chamber, and orchestral music, as well as recordings while conducting. For most cellists his most notable accomplishment was his recordings of the incomparable Bach Cello Suites which were recorded from 1936 to 1939. His early years in his native Catalonia, Spain were spent being educated in music by his father who was a parish organist and choirmaster. As would be clearly seen in his later years, his understanding of music was amazing. Today his master classes on the cello are available for cellists to observe on YouTube. His ability to demonstrate proper tempo and rhythm as well as the use of dynamics is still a benefit even in the age of famous cellist, YoYo Ma His father’s techniques included he and his brother listening to, and name notes on the piano by ear. Although his father’s methods may have seemed extreme, they served only to further young Pablo’s musical ability. By the age of four he was playing the flute, piano and violin and by age six was proficient enough to perform a public solo on the violin. It is amazing to know that his first exposure to any cello like instrument was that of a street performer that had been fashioned from a broom handle! His first personal experience with the cello was much like my own. At fourteen I asked for a cello and was allowed by my father to borrow a very broken down cello. Casals was given an instrument made from a gourd by his father as his first cello. When he was eleven he heard some travelling performers and saw a real cello for the first time. After that, the cello was his instrument of choice. Although I play other instruments, as Casals did, it was hard to deny that I wanted to be known as â€Å"a cellist†! The Cello Suites composed by J. S. Bach were discovered by Casals in 1890 in a second hand music store. He was thirteen at the time and spent the next thirteen years practicing and perfecting them and then finally performing them in public. He graduated with honors from Escola Municipal de Musica in Barcelona, having made impressive progress, at age nineteen. His professional career began when he moved to Paris in 1895 and played second cello in a theater orchestra. In 1895 he returned home to Catalonia and was appointed to the faculty of his own Escola Municipal de Musica. He was also made principal cellist in the orchestra of Barcelonas opera house, the Liceu and in 1897 he performed as soloist with the Madrid Symphony Orchestra, and was awarded the Order of Carlos III from the Queen of Spain. His later career found him conducting master classes, as mentioned earlier, throughout the world. Some of the master classes were actually televised in the 1960’s and are still available for budding cellists. It was at this point in his career that he created unique versions of the six Brandenburg Concerti. To add this to his already amazing recordings of the Bach Suites truly showed the depth of his musical abilities! In addition to performing remarkable renditions of famous pieces he was a wonderful composer in his own right. One of his most notable works was La Sardena, composed for a cello ensemble. The completion of his composing career was a piece titled â€Å"Hymne of the United Nations† which he performed in 1971, at a special event, for the United Nations shortly before his 95th birthday. Looking back with appreciation to a man who died many years before I was born, I am humbled by his talent and personality. He had the opportunity to perform before queens, presidents and dignitaries. His performances took him around the globe and his influence is felt to this day. His unique recordings and master classes continue to inspire and delight cellists and cello music lovers alike. In 1963 the world lost PabIo Casals at the age of 96 while residing in Puero Rico where he was buried. I am happy to say that I have been fortunate enough to observe a number of his master classes and hear recordings done almost a century ago that have stood the test of time.

The Prince :: essays research papers

Born in Florence on May 3, 1469, Machiavelli entered government service as a clerk and rose to prominence when the Florentine Republic was proclaimed in 1498. Machiavelli was an upright man, a good citizen, and a good father. He was not by any means a faithful husband but lived in affectionate harmony with his wife, Marietta Corsini (whom he had married in the latter part of 1501), and had five children by her. He loved his native city "more than his own soul," and he was generous, ardent, and basically religious. He was secretary of the ten-man council that conducted the diplomatic negotiations and supervised the military operations of the republic, and his duties included missions to the French king (1504, 1510-11), the Holy See (1506), and the German emperor (1507-8). In the course of his diplomatic missions within Italy he became acquainted with many of the Italian rulers and was able to study their political tactics, particularly those of the ecclesiastic and soldier Cesare Borgia, who was at that time engaged in enlarging his holdings in central Italy. From 1503 to 1506 Machiavelli reorganized the military defense of the republic of Florence. Although mercenary armies were common during this period, he preferred to rely on the conscription of native troops to ensure a permanent and patriotic defense of the commonwealth. In 1512, when the Medici, a Florentine family, regained power in Florence and the republic was dissolved, he was deprived of office and briefly imprisoned for alleged conspiracy against them. After his release he retired to his estate near Florence, where he wrote his most important works. Despite his attempts to gain favor with the Medici rulers, he was never restored to his prominent government position. When the republic was temporarily reinstated in 1527, he was suspected by many republicans of pro-Medici leanings. Machiavelli's methodology involved the empirical observation of human nature and behaviour, which he believed to be changeless. His deep feelings about the degradation and corruption of Italy at his time led him to put his hope into the daring and the violence of a great man who would exercise power ruthlessly but with prudence. Power, Machiavelli apparently believed, legitimized the state, if rationally applied, by a man able to manipulate the people and use the army for his own purposes. In his quest for a "new prince" and a new principle of policy he knew that he was opening "a road as yet untrodden by man.

Rhetoric and Life

Dylan Macknight Mrs. Womack Per. 6 14, September 2009. Value of Life Essay Different authors use different techniques to persuade. The three main ways of persuading are through: pathos, which uses emotions, ethos, which proves their credibility, and logos, which implies the general message. Shakespeare, Lance Armstrong, and Amanda Ripley have all written articles arguing their opinion on the value of life. Of the three articles Lance Armstrong best persuades the audience with his argument that life is very valuable and that you could better your life from something negative, through his exceptional use of both logos and pathos.Armstrong applies the use of ethos very clearly in his article. For example, â€Å"I still don’t completely understand it; all I can do is tell you what happened†. This shows that he is writing credible work and that his ideas are non-bias. He is telling the story as is and he is not trying to lead you on. Lance also uses pathos to persuade his au dience as well. An example of this would be when stated â€Å"I have cancer†. Cancer is a serious disease and the thought of having it draws on someone’s emotions quite strongly.This quote made the reader feel sympathy for him. Overall, Armstrong did the best job at persuading. In Hamlet’s Soliloquy, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos, and logos as an attempt to persuade his audience, but is not as effective as Armstrong. Shakespeare uses logos the most in his work. When he states â€Å"To be or not to be, that is the question†, he is portraying the message of how much his own life is worth, personally, not how valuable life is a whole. That is one downfall in Shakespeare’s work compared to Armstrongs.Another reason Hamlet’s Soliloquy is not as successful at persuading is because in his writing there is no one else to compare and contrast their life with. Hamlet is written as somebody who is contemplating suicide. It is very hard to understand s omeone’s thoughts and interpret them as they were intended to be. This is what makes the soliloquy quite faulty in persuading the reader. Amanda Ripley voices her belief on what a life is worth in the article that she wrote for Time Magazine.She argued how much money one can assign to another’s life, and if different people should be worth more or less then others. Time Magazine and CNN took a poll last month stating, â€Å"86% of the people should have received the same amount†. Who is to say that the majority of humans are worth the same dollar amount and a select few should receive more money. Many people do not agree with the way Ripley argues her opinion in â€Å"What a Life is Worth†. She states, â€Å"I am proud of what my country tried to do, I think the intention is noble†.This shows that she had a previous opinion on the subject prior to the article that she had written. That adds a possibility that the article is prone to being bias towa rds her opinion. That is how Ripley failed to persuade her readers. Ultimately, of the three articles, Lance Armstrong best persuades his audience with his argument that life is very valuable and that you can better your life from something negative, through his exceptional use of logos and pathos. Many of his readers are left feeling completely persuaded by his value on life.